Thursday, July 30, 2009
U.S. judge orders Guantanamo prisoner Jawad freed
A U.S. judge on Thursday ordered that one of the youngest detainees held at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, be released for what is expected to be a trip home to Afghanistan, a case that could be a model for dealing with the other 228 prisoners there.
The release of Mohammed Jawad would be the first under new stricter rules set by the U.S. Congress for dealing with the detainees held at the prison at a U.S. naval base in Cuba, which President Barack Obama has pledged to close by mid-January 2010.
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Thursday ordered that one of the youngest detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, be released by late August in a case that drew wide attention because of rulings that he had been tortured by Afghan officials and abused in American custody. “Enough has been imposed on this young man to date,” the judge, Ellen Segal Huvelle, said in a courtroom crowded with people drawn by what had become a confrontation between the judge and the Obama administration.
But it was not clear Thursday whether Judge Huvelle’s order will mean freedom for the detainee, Mohammed Jawad, who has long faced American charges that, as a teenager, he threw a hand grenade in Kabul in 2002 that injured two American servicemen and their Afghan interpreter.
Will the Obama administration release Guantanamo detainee Mohammed Jawad, thereby pleasing the ACLU crowd? Or, is it going to move forward with a criminal prosecution, as the DOJ has suggested?
Here is the background, in brief. Jawad is accused of throwing a hand grenade at a vehicle carrying two American servicemen and their Afghan translator. All three were seriously wounded in the attack. A federal court ruled today that Jawad should be released. This comes after that same court lambasted the evidence the Department of Justice was using to justify Jawad’s detention earlier this month. The ACLU, which represents Jawad, and U.S. District Court Judge Ellen Huvelle want Jawad released as soon as possible.
But the Obama administration is reportedly hesitating, saying that they are still exploring the possibility of bringing criminal charges against Jawad. Obama’s DOJ says new evidence has come to light, including possibly eyewitnesses who can identify Jawad as the attacker.
“The criminal investigation is continuing,” Deputy Assistant Attorney General Ian Gershengorn said to Judge Huvelle.
However, the ACLU is under the impression that the DOJ has agreed to release Jawad to his home country of Afghanistan. A statement from the ACLU’s Jonathan Hafetz says, “We are pleased that the Justice Department has expressed a commitment to getting him home so that this nightmare of abuse and injustice can finally come to an end.”
It appears that the Guantanamo judges will be receptive to the Obama administration's request to stay these commissions, as another military judge -- this one overseeing the proceedings against five detainees accused of involvement in the 9/11 attacks, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed -- just ordered the commissions stayed for 120 days, as Obama ordered his prosecutors to request. And the Swiss Government today announced that it will agree to accept released Guantanamo detainees if that helps close the camp, which Switzerland, like most of the civilized world, considers a blight on Western justice and an ongoing violation of international law. Those are fairly rapid (and encouraging) events for the first 24 hours.
On a related note, AP obtained the draft Executive Order now being circulated in the White House that directs that "the detention facilities at Guantanamo for individuals covered by this order shall be closed as soon as practicable, and no later than one year from the date of this order." A definitive date certain for closing that camp is vital, though the real question is and will continue to be: under what system and rules will the detainees, once transferred to the U.S., be tried?
hamed Jawad – Child Detainee
ISN: 900
Age at time of arrest: 12
Nationality: Afghanistan
Residence: Pakistan
Date of Arrest: 12-17-2002
Arrested in: Kabul, Afghanistan
A judge ruled Thursday that one of the youngest detainees brought to Guantanamo Bay is being held illegally and must be released 6 years after the detainee from Afghanistan says he was tortured into confessing at age 12.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20090730/pl_nm/us_guantanamo_jawad;_ylt=AjEtvEhm64wMR35F90OlBPQV6w8F;_ylu=X3oDMTJtNzFuOTV1BGFzc2V0A25tLzIwMDkwNzMwL3VzX2d1YW50YW5hbW9famF3YWQEY3BvcwM3BHBvcwM3BHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcmllcwRzbGsDanVkZ2VvcmRlcnNy
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/31/us/31gitmo.html?partner=rss&emc=rss
http://www.weeklystandard.com/weblogs/TWSFP/2009/07/clock_is_ticking_on_mohammed_j_1.asp
http://www.weeklystandard.com/SubscribersOnly.asp
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohamed_Jawhttp://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2009/01/21/guantanamo/
http://www.andyworthington.co.uk/2007/10/17/the-afghan-teenager-put-forward-for-trial-by-military-commission-at-guantanamo/
http://projects.nytimes.com/guantanamo/detainees/900-mohamed-jawad
http://www.counterpunch.org/worthington10172007.html
http://freedetainees.org/mohamed-jawad
http://content.usatoday.com/topics/topic/Mohamed+Jawad
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/guantanamo
Friday, July 24, 2009
The tragic Murder of Marwa Sherbini in Germany
Pregnant Marwa El Sherbini was murdered in front of her 3-year-old son.
July 6, 2009 — Mira Vogel
This needs to be surfaced. Nearly a week ago in a Dresden courthouse a 32 year old pregnant woman, Marwa El Sherbini, was stabbed to death in a frenzied attack. Her killer was the man against whom she had just won a defamation case for hate speech – she wore a headscarf and he’d called her “terrorist”. Her husband Elwi Okaz, a geneticist, was critically injured when he intervened, and their three-year-old son was present. Bikya Masr says the man, who is reported not to be affiliated to a far right organisation, had a deep hatred of foreigners.
This hate crime was a fatal nexus of Islamophobic sentiment at a time when the veil is being argued over in Europe. Egyptians, including Eman Abdel Rahman, have been disgusted by the media silence.
Posted in Uncategorized. Tags: islamophobia, Marwa Al-Sherbini, Marwa El Sherbini. 82 Comments »
82 Responses to “Marwa El Sherbini”
Paul Siemering Says:
July 7, 2009 at 3:05 am
She was stabbed 18 times in a courtroom? What were the German police, the prosecutor, the judge, ANYONE doing? until i get an explanation i will consider the german injustice system complicit in this crime.
By now many Muslims have heard of the tragic murder of Marwa el-Sherbini, mother, daughter, wife, pharmacist, who lived in Germany while her husband completed his Ph.D. May God give her peace and grant her paradise.
According to the BBC:
Marwa Sherbini, 31, was stabbed 18 times by Axel W, who is now under arrest in Dresden for suspected murder. Husband Elwi Okaz is also in a critical condition in hospital, after being injured as he tried to save his wife. Ms Sherbini had sued her killer after he called her a “terrorist” because of her headscarf.
Sherbini, who was pregnant at the time, had sued and won the case. At this point in time they had been in the courthouse to hear Axel/Alex’s appeal.
According to CNN:
The man, identified in German media as Alex A., 28, was convicted of calling Sherbini, who wore a headscarf, “terrorist,” “bitch” and “Islamist” when she asked him to leave a swing for her 3-year-old son Mustafa during an August 2008 visit to a children’s park.
Subsequently, Sherbini sued W. for his Islamophobic rant.
Christian Avenarius, the prosecutor in Dresden where the incident took place, described the killer as driven by a deep hatred of Muslims. “It was very clearly a xenophobic attack of a fanatical lone wolf.”
He added that the attacker was a Russian of German descent who had immigrated to Germany in 2003 and had expressed his contempt for Muslims at the start of the trial.
The Islamophobic and racist nature of the attack is clear. If one follows the events as reported by the media, it appears clear that this man was driven by a hate of Muslims. He initially referred to her in Islamophobic ways and was thus sued and lost. He then attacked her again, though the nature of the attack is unclear, which resulted in prosecutors seeking a jail term for W. He then murdered Sherbini in the courtroom, yelling “[y]ou have no right to live.”
The “Hijab Martyr”
Sherbini is being hailed by many Egyptians, as well as others, as the “Hijab Martyr” as she lost her life because she was Muslim, a part of her identity made obvious by her hijab.
Newspapers in Egypt have expressed outrage at the case, asking how it was allowed to happen and dubbing Ms Sherbini “the martyr of the Hijab”. - BBC News.
Anger about Sherbini’s death smoldered online, as Twitterers and bloggers pushed the cause.
“She is a victim of hatred and racism,” tweeted Ghada Essawy, among many other Arab twitters and bloggers. Essawy called Sherbini “the martyr of the veil.” - CNN.
According to numerous interviews in Egyptian local papers with el-Sherbini family, the man who stabbed al-Sherbini used to accuse her of being a “terrorist,” and in one incident, he tried to take off her head scarf. Mourners at her funeral called her the “martyr of the head scarf.” - Huffington Post
Some have stated that claiming her to be a hijab martyr is inappropriate as W. did not state that he hated her because of her hijab or that he killed her because of it. But what they forget is that the hijab is what made it obvious that she was Muslim. It is the hijab which led to the initial harassment. Had she not worn the hijab, perhaps she would not have faced Islamophobic comments. Additionally, Sherbini died defending her right to wear the hijab without fear of harassment as a result of it. Therefore, the term “hijab martyr” seems appropriate in this case. The hijab, in this case, serves to function as the proxy for being Muslim.
It’s about Egyptians, not Sherbini
As Maggie Michael of the Huffington Post mentions this story has received little attention in German and Western media. However, the attention that has been given to the case has focused on the anger Egyptians in Egypt, as well as other Muslims and Arabs, have felt over the case.
BBC News entitled their piece “Egypt mourns ‘headscarf martyr‘”. Additionally, they describe the murderer’s initial actions toward Sherbini as “insulting her religion” – an inaccurate statement, as W. insulted Sherbini herself, not her religion. Making such a statement skews the reality of the case and paints the story as the “Muslim angry over insult to Islam” trope. Stating this lie trivializes Sherbini’s very real experience of personal hate and Islamophobia. It diminishes W.’s hateful actions toward a Muslim woman. It ignores the fact that it was human being who was hurt, not a religion.
CNN reported “Egyptians angry over German court slaying“. The article focuses on the anger that many Egyptians are feeling as a result of the incident providing such quotes as:
Many shouted hostile slogans against Germany and called for Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak to take a firm stand on the incident. Egypt’s grand mufti, Mohammed Sayyed Tantawi, demanded the severest punishment to be issued against Alex A.
Berlin witnessed angry protests on Saturday, when hundreds of Arabs and Muslims demonstrated after a funeral prayer that called her killing an outrageous racist murder against Muslims.
The Guardian entitled their piece “Outrage over Muslim woman killed in court” and continued to explain:
Many in her homeland were outraged by the attack and saw the low-key response in Germany as an example of racism and anti-Muslim sentiment.
“There is no God but God and the Germans are the enemies of God,” chanted mourners for 32-year-old Marwa el-Sherbini in Alexandria, where her body was buried.
“We will avenge her killing,” her brother Tarek el-Sherbini told the Associated Press by telephone from the mosque where prayers were being recited in front of his sister’s coffin. “In the west, they don’t recognise us. There is racism.”
The rage that many feel over her death is not just about the loss of an innocent life. But it also reflects an anger at the hate that many Muslims are facing around the world. Sherbini’s murder, and subsequent silence on the part of Germans, appears to demonstrate a disregard for the experiences and lives of Muslims. Therefore, although many could take those statements out of context and attribute them simply to “those angry Muslims”, one must consider that such anger is not just about Sherbini’s murder. It is about the complicity of many Western nations in Islamophobic beliefs and actions, and about the frustration of Muslims regarding this lack of respect for such traumatic experiences faced by Muslims living in Muslim minority countries.
From the Huffington Post:
A German Muslim group criticized government officials and the media for not paying enough attention to the crime.
“The incident in Dresden had anti-Islamic motives. So far, the reactions from politicians and media have been incomprehensibly meager,” Aiman Mazyek, the general secretary of the Central Council of Muslims, told Berlin’s Tagesspiegel daily.
Egyptian commentators said the incident was an example of how hate crimes against Muslims are overlooked in comparison to those committed by Muslims against Westerners. Many commentators pointed to the uproar that followed the 2004 murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh by a Dutch-born Islamic fundamentalist angry over one of his films criticizing the treatment of Muslim women.
Also from the Huffington Post:
“What we demand is just some attention to be given to the killing of a young innocent mother on the hands of fanatic extremist,” he wrote in his column.
An Egyptian blogger Hicham Maged, wrote “let us play the ‘What If’ game.”
“Just imagine if the situation was reversed and the victim was a Westerner who was stabbed anywhere in the world or _ God forbid _ in any Middle Eastern country by Muslim extremists,” he said.
Yes, imagine. The news would have spread like wildfire and all Muslims would be being condemned.
From the articles, one would assume that it is only Egyptians and/or other Arabs and/or Muslims who are the ones outraged by this Islamophobic murder. And one could assume right. No outrage has poured out from Germans. No outrage from any other Western nations either.
It is here I will ask the same question asked of Muslims every time a Muslim some place in the world commits a crime. Where are the moderate Germans I ask? Where are the moderate Westerners? Where is their outrage at the acts of hate by one of their own? Why is the burden of being outraged at the actions of “one of our own” only placed on Muslims? Why can we not expect fellow Germans as complicit in some manner as all Muslims are assumed to be complicit?
We are thought to be one monolithic entity, barbaric to the point of being complicit in all acts of violence. White Westerners on the other hand are viewed as diverse, understood to not condone violence, therefore not required to express their condemnation of violent acts committed in their name. Of course they would not condone such violence, we are expected to believe. But Muslims, and other minority groups, are not given that luxury. We must prove that we condemn violence. Such condemnation of violence cannot be assumed or expected of us. We are after all barbarians, we are expected to believe.
And this leads to my next and final point.
The lone wolf
In one above quote W. is described as a lone wolf. In this Racialicious post regrading the shooting at the Holocaust museum, a discussion ensued in the comments section regarding the problems with painting a white supremacist criminal as a lone, crazy killer acting on his/her own.
The fact is that such white supremacist beliefs and attitudes do not exist in a vacuum. They do not occur in isolation. They require nurturing and a complicit society. W.’s use of the terms “terrorist” and “Islamist” were not creations of his own imagination. The association of Muslims with terrorism and Islamism was not his creation. His hate of Muslims and derogatory views of Muslims were not his own creation, but rather a creation of the world he lives in. His actions were not that of a lone wolf, but rather of one living in a society full of Islamophobia.
This of course does not shift the blame from him, but rather places his behavior in context and demonstrates how, when one is the powerful group in society, if not the world, then that power means a greater ability to perpetuate hateful views and to cause more damage as those words and actions become just another method of oppression.
Additionally, if one views this portrayal as the one lone criminal in contrast to the ways in which people of color, including Muslims of color, are portrayed as guilty by association, one sees the ways in which people of color are viewed as violent barbarians whereas white, non-Muslims as civilized individuals who would never condone violence.
Conclusion
Sherbini’s tragic murder has reminded us once again of the violent nature of Islamophobia and the lack of regard for a Muslim life. From the ways in which the media reports this tragedy, one would assume that Sherbini’s murder has disturbed only those who share her religion. Not many others have expressed any outrage. Even a “German government spokesman, Thomas Steg, said that if the attack was racist, the government ‘naturally condemns this in the strongest terms’ ” (emphasis mine). Although many more should be outraged, there seems to be a denial among those who have allowed for such hateful views of Muslims to perpetuate of the severity of this case.
http://en.wordpress.com/tag/marwa-el-sherbini/
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
Serbs Convicted of Burning Muslims alive in Visegrad
Sredoje Lukic was convicted of aiding and abetting his cousin Milan in one of the atrocities
THE HAGUE: A UN war crimes court convicted two Bosnian Serb cousins on Monday for a “callous” 1992 killing spree that included locking scores of Muslims in two houses and burning them alive.
Yugoslav war crimes tribunal judge Patrick Robinson said burning 119 Muslims to death in the eastern Bosnian town of Visegrad “exemplified the worst acts of inhumanity that one person may inflict on others.” He sentenced Milan Lukic to life in prison and Sredoje Lukic to 30 years.
Robinson said Milan Lukic was the ringleader in both incidents, helping herd victims into the houses, setting the fires and shooting those who tried to flee the flames.
The judgment said his cousin Sredoje Lukic aided and abetted in one of the blazes. Witnesses “vividly remembered the terrible screams of the people in the house,” Robinson said, adding that Milan Lukic used the butt of his rifle to herd people into the house, and said, “come on, let’s get as many people inside as possible
Milan Lukic also was convicted of murdering 12 other Muslims, shooting them in the back on the banks of the Drina River, which runs through Visegrad, so the current would sweep away their bodies. One of the victims was murdered in front of his wife and child.
Robinson said Milan Lukic “ignored the victims pleas for their lives,” as he and other Serb paramilitaries executed them with a single shot in the back before firing into the bodies of any men they believed were still alive.
Milan Lukic led a paramilitary group known as both the “White Eagles” and the “Avengers,” which terrorized Muslims in Visegrad. His cousin Sredoje was a local policeman and a member of the group. Both men were also convicted of cruelty for visiting a detention center to savagely beat Muslim inmates.
According to ICTY documents, based on the victims reports, some 3,000 Bosniaks were murdered during the violence in Višegrad and its surrounding, including some 600 women and 119 children. According to the Research and Documentation Center, 1661 Bosniaks were killed/missing in Višegrad.
According to the survivors and the report submitted to UNHCR by the Bosnian government, the Drina river was used to dump many of the bodies of the Bosniak men, women and children who were killed around the town and on the famous Mehmed Paša Sokolović Bridge, as well as the new one. Day after day, truckloads of Bosniak civilians were taken down to the bridge and riverbank by Serb paramilitaries, unloaded, slashed or shot, and thrown into the river. In one instance, during the murder of a group of 22 people on June 18, 1992, the Lukić's group tore out the kidneys of several individuals, while the others were tied to cars and dragged through the streets; their children were thrown from the bridge and shot at before they hit the water.The Bikavac and Pionirska case Many other victims were locked in a houses en masse and grenaded to death or burned alive. In one instance, 58 people (14 were men and the rest women and children) were identified as burned to death on the Serb holiday "Vidovdan" June 27, 1992, on Pionirska Street, leaving one female survivor - Zehra Turjacanin. Zehra testified a couple of times at the Hague Tribual:
Eliticide in Visegrad
Eliticide is defined as the systematic killing of a community’s political and economic leadership so that the community could not regenerate. After the Yugoslav People’s Army occupied Visegrad, the Serb Crisis Committee (”krizni stab” led by Serb Democratic Party) took control of the municipality. Leading Bosniak intellectuals, political leaders and activists, members of the Islamic Religious Community (Islamska Vjerska Zajednica) and Police officers were expelled from work, arrested, jailed, called for “informative talks”, or kept under house arrest. Serb Police officials gave Serb paramilitary groups lists of Bosniaks who possessed firearms, who then went individually man to man and asked them to turn in their firearms[11] Bosniak intellectuals were systematically murdered, these intellectuals included Safet Zejnilovic – Doctor; Fejzo Šabanija – Secretary at Party of Democratic Action (Bosniak political party); Zihnija Omerovic – leading member of the Territorial Defense; Himzo Demir – well- known Principal of Secondary School “Hamid Besirovic”; Salko Suceska – Engineer; Halil Ahmedspahic – Engineer; Behija Zukic – well-known owner of several businesses (Milan Lukic murdered Behija and her husband, stole her red Passat and drove it over the next couple of years); Tufo Tankovic – Principal of “Hasan Veletovac” School (This school would soon become a concentration camp); Safet Efendija Karaman – Imam (Muslim religious priest) at a mosque in Visegrad.
Milan Lukic was arrested in August 2005 in Argentina and sent for trial in The Hague.
Milan Lukic went on the run for seven years after he was indicted
http://www.arabnews.com/?page=4§ion=0&article=124728&d=21&m=7&y=2009
isegrad
http://www.fuckfrance.com/topic/3480319/1/World/Bosnian-Serb-Cousins-Convicted-of-Burning-Over-100-Muslims-Alive.html&replies=4
http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/main/news/21196/
http://www.france24.com/en/20090720-hague-icty-international-tribunal-yugoslavia-bosnia-muslims-Milan-Sredoje-Lukic
http://belgrade.usembassy.gov/archives/press/2005/b050810.html
http://www.bosniak.org/
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
The Mercy Ship Spirit Hijacked by Israel Off Gaza Coast
The mercy ship Spirit of Humanity was hijacked by Israel off the coast of Gaza.
"The Israeli Navy took control of the Spirit of Humanity on 30 June, diverting it to Ashdod port in Israel. All those on board, were handed over to Israeli immigration officials. The Israeli authorities deported the detainees on 6 July."
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Crashes on notorious Egypt road kill 22
Egypt's roads are among the most chaotic and dangerous in the world, with traffic laws flouted widely and roads not properly maintained.
Twenty-two Egyptians were killed on Tuesday in two separate accidents on the notoriously dangerous road between the capital Cairo and the southern city of Minya.
All 15 people in one microbus were killed when their driver fell asleep at the wheel, crashing into a parked lorry on the roadside near the town of Beni Mazar, a police officer said.
Just hours later, a microbus and truck crashed head-on further north on the same road killing seven people and leaving 20 injured.
In 2008, more than 8,000 people died from traffic-related accidents.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090707/wl_africa_afp/egyptaccidentroad_20090707112345
Monday, July 6, 2009
Riots in Xinjiang 140 Killed July-06-09
URUMQI, Xingyang. Violent street battles killed at least 140 people and injured 828 others in the deadliest ethnic unrest to hit China's volatile western Xinjiang region in decades, and officials said Monday the death toll was expected to rise.
Security forces have clamped down on the city of Urumqi and set up checkpoints to catch any fleeing rioters, state media reported, after tensions between ethnic Muslim Uighur people and China's Han majority erupted into riots.
Uighurs make up the largest ethnic group in Xinjiang, but not in the capital of Urumqi, which has attracted large numbers of Han Chinese migrants. The city of 2.3 million is now about overwhelmingly Chinese — a source of frustration for native Uighurs.
Many Uighurs yearn for independence for Xinjiang, a sprawling region rich in minerals and oil that borders eight Central Asian nations. Critics say the millions of Han Chinese who have settled here in recent years are gradually squeezing the Turkic people out of their homeland.
Voice of America
State-run Xinhua news agency says Sunday's fighting left more than 800 injured in the provincial capital Urumqi.
China tightly controls Xinjiang province, where it refers to some Uighurs as "violent separatists" looking to create an independent country called "East Turkestan."
Hundreds are believed to be killed after riots in the capital of Xinjiang on the 5th of July. There are reports of Han police firing indiscriminantly into crowds of protestors armed with kthe Uighur population of China's far West has grown increasingly resentful of Chinese rule which activists say discriminates against the local Muslim population in favour of Han Chinese. nives and other weapons.
Such is the scale of the influx that Han Chinese, who accounted for just six per cent of the Xinjiang's population in 1949 when China sent troops to 'liberate' the region, now make up more than 40 per cent of the total population.
Xinjiang is officially an autonomous region covering an area about three times the size of France in China's west.
Region is sparsely populated but has large reserves of oil, gas and minerals.
Xinjiang was formerly a key transit point on the ancient Silk Road linking China to Europe.
Region's Turkic speaking Uighur population number around 8 million.
Uighur activists say migration from other parts of China is part of official effort to dilute Uighur culture in their own land.
Uighurs say they face repression on a range of fronts, including bans on the teaching of their language.
Uighur separatists have staged series of low-level attacks since early 1990s.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090706/ap_on_re_as/as_china_protest
http://www.registan.net/index.php/2009/07/06/clhttp://www.voanews.com/english/2009-07-06-voa6.cfmash-in-xinjiang-july-5-2009/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/5755863/China-riots-worst-outbreak-of-ethnic-violence-in-33-years.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-EVRZEUyCM
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2009/07/20097641242376417.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)